Maybe they learned this from the Arnold Gehlen, philosopher who happened to be from the nazi party, but that made a very good definition of technology in some article of his, in my opnion. They want direct interaction between your brain and the device. I trust more Apple´s goals as a company, even if it goes backwads from time to time. is harrd to tell, but ma ny times i got the impression that Cubase users were googling for things i find just funnny, like "how is this a problem for him" haha YOu can load your whole ethnic orchestra in your synth project so easy. Chord tracks do not impress me, but is a key feature.Ī key pro of Logic pro : transform sets, many good instruments from start (Alchemy/Sampler), the new stacking feature and how easy it makes for template blocks. The rest needs an extensive objetive comparation.Ī key pro of Cubase (but i am not user): the macros, the attention to midi details.
This was my very first impression years ago. YOu may find funny, but Logic Pro looks very inteliggent for me, just from the moment i look into the screen.
#CUBASE VS LOGIC VS PRO TOOLS VS ABLETON VS REASON PROFESSIONAL#
BEfore i write extensively, I try to find a video of a guy who is super professional and switched many times from day to day, and says why for 40 minutes. HOwever, CUbase has apparently some pros in midi, that i am also curious about to know if it is true. When Logic users hype some feature of Logic, i think they are often highlighting something CUbase can´t do, like the Ipad remote thing. I say this because they look to be amazed with things in CUbase as they were "tricks", while Logic just do it. What i can say for sure, is that many cubase users are ignorant of qhat Logic can do. How important is the score editor for you? A lot of things. Do you want to compose in a mac studio ultra, if you can? Click to expand.to give a simple answer: it is more if you tend to Microsoft or Apple thought patterns.
0 kommentar(er)
